Barter the moral by understanding.

The basic guide of every society is still these days, mostly moral judgment.

And it is no coincidence, being that, from a very early age, the person is indoctrinated with scolding, high tones in the voice, frown, hand gestures, shouts and even blows. They indicate that something is being done, let's not say badly, but rather, something discordant with the idea of good of the adult in charge of "education."

With this type of instruction-alienation, it is hard to understand what good living and happiness are all about, because the moral mind tends to judge everything and that way it feels that it controls, because it terrifies what is beyond of the pre-established logic.

And morale is very tricky because of its subjective character. The appeal of morality is only valid in the lack of understanding and in the neglect that avoids using discernment in the present moment in which life and its circumstances occur.

Morality is necessarily based on the past, on what has been learned intellectually.

Maybe at the time, Moses had had the good intention of guiding the "good" way to the people of the time, for this he worked so hard carving ten rigid commandments in stone, which by the way, nobody ever fulfilled. From this fact would have emerged the ingenious phrase attributed to Jesus, "who is free from sin that throws the first stone."

It is much healthier and more sensible to understand what this is about being "good" and it has more to do with understanding and feeling genuine than with a moral issue.

The reason is simple. It is about reaching that understanding that arises from the conscious observation of one's experience. Understanding that no evil or good outside of a conscious state, designed by a logical-rational mind, can be intelligent. Since the bias caused by moral judgment distorts perception.

This means that you can have great good intentions, and it is commendable, but it is ignorant, being that the level of evaluation that can be made of the consequences is based on a knowledge of the very broad reality, almost null.

And this is the greatest damage that morals could do by depriving people of their genuine feeling that guides their actions regardless of the consequences, since their ignorance is evident.

Science, in its most essential sense, could be an indication of that desire to understand. Reference is made to the essentials of science, which is to try to understand the universe, nature, the truth beyond. Because there is another "science" that can be as much or more harmful than morality.

The idea of ​​this article is to present an easier option to carry out, lighter and is to understand rather than judge or speculate.

The understanding that dictates that wisdom is nothing more than the awareness of one's own ignorance, frees the person from all moral judgment, which can only become discomfort.

Salud